Anderson v. Crouch
Case Overview
Supreme Court case. Source material is limited and the case cannot be confidently identified from the case name alone without a docket number. Full FIRAC is deferred pending Iris-H verification.
The Facts
The case name Anderson v. Crouch suggests a civil dispute, possibly involving election law, civil rights, or administrative proceedings. Without a confirmed docket number or term year, the court, holding, and vote split cannot be accurately stated.
The Conclusion
FLAGGED for Iris-H: docket number unconfirmed. Case identification needed before full FIRAC can be written. Do not merge without verification.
No circuit court data for this case.
Case Analysis
Overview
Supreme Court case. Source material is limited and the case cannot be confidently identified from the case name alone without a docket number. Full FIRAC is deferred pending Iris-H verification.
Facts
The case name Anderson v. Crouch suggests a civil dispute, possibly involving election law, civil rights, or administrative proceedings. Without a confirmed docket number or term year, the court, holding, and vote split cannot be accurately stated.
Issue
To be confirmed by Iris-H lookup.
Rule
To be confirmed pending case identification.
Analysis
**This case metadata needs correction before I can write the Application section.**
Docket 22-1927 is a **Fourth Circuit case**, not a SCOTUS case. Anderson v. Crouch involves a [Fourth Circuit decision](https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/221927A.p.pdf) (8-6 en banc, April 2024) upholding a district court ruling that West Virginia's Medicaid exclusion of "transsexual surgery" violates the Equal Protection Clause and Section 1557 of the ACA. The Supreme Court granted cert on the related petition (24-90, *Crouch v. Anderson*) and [vacated/remanded](https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/crouch-v-anderson/) for reconsideration in light of *United States v. Skrmetti* (June 30, 2025).
**To write a proper Application section, I need:** 1. Confirmation of which forum this tracker entry covers (Fourth Circuit opinion, or SCOTUS petition post-*Skrmetti* remand?) 2. The verified Rule and Issue for that forum 3. Whether the case is still pending remand or has been re-decided on remand
Route to Iris-H for verification: confirm court/docket/status and provide complete FIRAC before submission.
Conclusion
FLAGGED for Iris-H: docket number unconfirmed. Case identification needed before full FIRAC can be written. Do not merge without verification.
Notes
Buster episode_case_registry (1 ep: 0316 AM). Title card: 'Anderson v. Crouch 22-1927'. Needs CL verification. SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket, not yet on CourtListener SCOTUS docket. Not yet on CourtListener
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support