← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Flowers v. Mississippi

No. 17-9572 SCOTUS · Decided Decided SCOTUS
📄 Read the Opinion

Case Overview

Curtis Flowers was tried six times for the same quadruple murder in Winona, Mississippi, with the same prosecutor using peremptory strikes to remove virtually every Black prospective juror across the trials. The Supreme Court reversed 7-2 in 2019, finding that the history of race-based juror exclusion across all six trials was directly relevant to assessing whether the sixth trial violated Batson v. Kentucky. The decision is notable for permitting cross-trial analysis of a prosecutor's pattern of discriminatory strikes.


The Conclusion

**The Supreme Court reversed 7-2, holding that a prosecutor's pattern of race-based juror strikes across multiple trials is relevant to assessing Batson violations.** The decision permitted cross-trial analysis to evaluate whether systematic exclusion of Black jurors demonstrated intentional discrimination, rather than evaluating each trial in isolation.

Court -
FiledMay 4, 2018
CL Statusactive
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

Cert Granted -
Statusactive
Filed (CL) -
View on CourtListener →
SCOTUS TMR-e1a9c5d7 Jun 3, 2026

Related by Concept (3)


Case Analysis

Overview

Curtis Flowers was tried six times for the same quadruple murder in Winona, Mississippi, with the same prosecutor using peremptory strikes to remove virtually every Black prospective juror across the trials. The Supreme Court reversed 7-2 in 2019, finding that the history of race-based juror exclusion across all six trials was directly relevant to assessing whether the sixth trial violated Batson v. Kentucky. The decision is notable for permitting cross-trial analysis of a prosecutor's pattern of discriminatory strikes.

Conclusion

**The Supreme Court reversed 7-2, holding that a prosecutor's pattern of race-based juror strikes across multiple trials is relevant to assessing Batson violations.** The decision permitted cross-trial analysis to evaluate whether systematic exclusion of Black jurors demonstrated intentional discrimination, rather than evaluating each trial in isolation.

Notes

588 U.S. 284 (2019). Applied Batson v. Kentucky (1986). Permitted cross-trial analysis of prosecutorial pattern of peremptory strikes.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support