Washington v. FEMA
Case Overview
A coalition of states sued the Federal Emergency Management Agency over the termination of the pre disaster management program, Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities.
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
The Application
The plaintiff states challenged FEMA's termination of BRIC, arguing the agency lacked proper authority to eliminate the program and failed to provide adequate justification for the decision in violation of procedural and substantive APA requirements.
The Conclusion
The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts rendered a decision on the dispute between the states and FEMA regarding the BRIC program termination.
Case Analysis
Issue
Whether FEMA possessed statutory authority to terminate the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) pre-disaster mitigation program and whether the termination violated the Administrative Procedure Act.
Rule
Under the Administrative Procedure Act, agency actions must be supported by reasoned explanation within the agency's delegated authority and must not be arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion.
Analysis
The plaintiff states challenged FEMA's termination of BRIC, arguing the agency lacked proper authority to eliminate the program and failed to provide adequate justification for the decision in violation of procedural and substantive APA requirements.
Conclusion
The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts rendered a decision on the dispute between the states and FEMA regarding the BRIC program termination.
Overview
A coalition of states sued the Federal Emergency Management Agency over the termination of the pre disaster management program, Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support