Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP. v. Executive Office of the President (WilmerHale EO, D.D.C., 2025)
Case Overview
WilmerHale sued the Trump administration following an executive order targeting the firm for its employment of Robert Mueller, pro bono work, and diversity efforts. The order sought to review and terminate contracts with WilmerHale, revoke security clearances of WilmerHale employees, bar WilmerHale employees from federal buildings, and more.
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
The Application
The executive order explicitly targeted WilmerHale for Robert Mueller's past employment at the firm, the firm's pro bono legal representation, and its diversity initiatives, all constitutionally protected expressive activities and associations. The threatened sanctions, contract termination, security clearance revocation, facility access restrictions, constitute government retaliation designed to punish protected conduct.
The Conclusion
Judge Leon found the executive order violated the First Amendment and enjoined its enforcement against WilmerHale, holding that the government failed to satisfy strict scrutiny or demonstrate any interest that would justify targeting the firm's protected activities.
Case Analysis
Issue
Whether an executive order targeting a law firm based on the employment of Robert Mueller, pro bono legal work, and diversity initiatives violates the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause, and the Administrative Procedure Act.
Rule
Government action that uses federal power to punish constitutionally protected expression or association violates the First Amendment unless it satisfies strict scrutiny. The executive branch cannot arbitrarily target private entities or use federal contracting, security clearances, and facility access as tools for political retaliation.
Analysis
The executive order explicitly targeted WilmerHale for Robert Mueller's past employment at the firm, the firm's pro bono legal representation, and its diversity initiatives. All constitutionally protected expressive activities and associations. The threatened sanctions (contract termination, security clearance revocation, facility access restrictions) constitute government retaliation designed to punish protected conduct.
Conclusion
Judge Leon found the executive order violated the First Amendment and enjoined its enforcement against WilmerHale, holding that the government failed to satisfy strict scrutiny or demonstrate any interest that would justify targeting the firm's protected activities.
Overview
The government appealed Judge Leon's order awarding summary judgement to WilmerHale and vacating President Trump's executive order targeting the law firm.
Overview
WilmerHale sued the Trump administration following an executive order targeting the firm for its employment of Robert Mueller, pro bono work, and diversity efforts. The order sought to review and terminate contracts with WilmerHale, revoke security clearances of WilmerHale employees, bar WilmerHale employees from federal buildings, and more.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support