Lawrence v. Texas
The Facts
Texas police arrested Lawrence and Garner in Lawrence's home after responding to a weapons disturbance report and discovering them engaging in same-sex sexual conduct. They were charged under Texas Penal Code § 21.06, which criminalized same-sex sodomy. Lawrence was convicted and fined $200. The Texas Court of Appeals upheld the conviction, distinguishing Bowers v. Hardwick.
The Issue
Does a state statute criminalizing same-sex sodomy violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? • Does the right to privacy extend to intimate sexual conduct between consenting adults of the same sex? • Should Bowers v. Hardwick be overruled?
The Rules
No state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
States may criminalize sodomy; no fundamental right to engage in same-sex sexual conduct. [Overruled by Lawrence]
A person commits an offense if the person engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex.
The Application
Lawrence and Garner's arrest under Texas Penal Code § 21.06 exemplified the exact liberty interest the Due Process Clause protects: two consenting adults engaging in intimate sexual conduct within the privacy of a home. The state's sole basis for the criminal statute was moral disapproval of same-sex sodomy, an impermissible ground for criminalizing private consensual conduct among adults. The Court found that applying the statute to criminalize Lawrence's conduct in his own home violated fundamental liberty because the government cannot restrict personal autonomy in intimate matters absent a legitimate reason beyond enforcing majoritarian morality. Texas's attempt to distinguish this case from general sodomy laws by targeting only same-sex conduct made the moral disapproval rationale even more apparent, demonstrating that the statute served no purpose other than to enforce a particular moral viewpoint.
The Conclusion
**The Court held 6-3 that Texas's sodomy statute violated the Due Process Clause.** Justice Kennedy's majority opinion recognized a liberty interest in intimate sexual conduct and overruled Bowers v. Hardwick, establishing that government cannot criminalize private consensual sexual conduct between adults. The decision significantly expanded constitutional protection for LGBTQ+ rights and personal autonomy.
No circuit court data for this case.
Case Analysis
Overview
The Supreme Court struck down a Texas statute criminalizing same-sex sodomy, holding it violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Facts
Texas police arrested Lawrence and Garner in Lawrence's home after responding to a weapons disturbance report and discovering them engaging in same-sex sexual conduct. They were charged under Texas Penal Code § 21.06, which criminalized same-sex sodomy. Lawrence was convicted and fined $200. The Texas Court of Appeals upheld the conviction, distinguishing Bowers v. Hardwick.
Issue
Do criminal laws targeting consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults in private violate the Due Process Clause's guarantee of liberty? Does Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), which upheld state sodomy laws, remain valid precedent?
Rule
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the liberty of adults to engage in private consensual sexual conduct; states may not criminalize this conduct based on moral disapproval alone. Bowers v. Hardwick was wrong when decided and must be overruled; the right to privacy protects intimate decisions made by adults in private relationships.
Analysis
Lawrence and Garner's arrest under Texas Penal Code § 21.06 exemplified the exact liberty interest the Due Process Clause protects: two consenting adults engaging in intimate sexual conduct within the privacy of a home. The state's sole basis for the criminal statute was moral disapproval of same-sex sodomy. An impermissible ground for criminalizing private consensual conduct among adults. The Court found that applying the statute to criminalize Lawrence's conduct in his own home violated fundamental liberty because the government cannot restrict personal autonomy in intimate matters absent a legitimate reason beyond enforcing majoritarian morality. Texas's attempt to distinguish this case from general sodomy laws by targeting only same-sex conduct made the moral disapproval rationale even more apparent, demonstrating that the statute served no purpose other than to enforce a particular moral viewpoint.
Conclusion
**The Court held 6-3 that Texas's sodomy statute violated the Due Process Clause.** Justice Kennedy's majority opinion recognized a liberty interest in intimate sexual conduct and overruled Bowers v. Hardwick, establishing that government cannot criminalize private consensual sexual conduct between adults. The decision significantly expanded constitutional protection for LGBTQ+ rights and personal autonomy.
Notes
2003 decision striking down Texas anti-sodomy law. Overruled Bowers v. Hardwick (1986). Bryan uses as substantive due process + liberty doctrine teaching case.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support