← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

American Federation of Government Employees v. Noem

No. 2:25-cv-00451 District · Active Active
Court
Federal Court
wawd
Judge
Jamal N. Whitehead 46
Filed
Mar 13, 2025
Judge (CL)
Jamal N. Whitehead 46
Filed (CL)
Mar 13, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

The AFGE sued the Transportation Security Administration over its cancellation of the collective bargaining agreement between the organizations which went into force on May 24, 2024.


The Application

History

The TSA's rescission of the CBA is challenged as an executive action that exceeded agency authority and violated statutory bargaining obligations, as the union was not afforded the opportunity to negotiate or contest the cancellation through the required statutory process.

The Conclusion

The case is active before Judge Jamal N. Whitehead in the Western District of Washington, with the merits pending on whether the rescission complied with federal labor law requirements.

Federal Court TMR-d2ac3019 Rescinding Collective Bargaining Agreements Jul 14, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

The AFGE sued the Transportation Security Administration over its cancellation of the collective bargaining agreement between the organizations which went into force on May 24, 2024.

Issue

Whether the Transportation Security Administration had lawful authority under federal labor law to unilaterally rescind a collective bargaining agreement with the American Federation of Government Employees that was in force since May 24, 2024.

Rule

Under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (5 U.S.C. § 7101 et seq.), federal agencies must recognize exclusive employee representatives and bargain collectively in good faith; modification or termination of a CBA requires compliance with statutory procedures and proper notice to the union.

Analysis

The TSA's rescission of the CBA is challenged as an executive action that exceeded agency authority and violated statutory bargaining obligations, as the union was not afforded the opportunity to negotiate or contest the cancellation through the required statutory process.

Conclusion

The case is active before Judge Jamal N. Whitehead in the Western District of Washington, with the merits pending on whether the rescission complied with federal labor law requirements.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support