← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Barnes v. Felix

No. 23-1239 SCOTUS · Decided SCOTUS
Cert Granted: Oct 4, 2024 Argued: Jan 22, 2025 Decided: May 15, 2025
📄 Read the Opinion

excessive force excessive use of force objective reasonableness standard reasonableness standard totality of the circumstances

Legal Issues

excessive forceexcessive use of forceobjective reasonableness standardreasonableness standardtotality of the circumstances

The Law · How the Case Works

Overview

Overview

A Texas deputy pulled Ashtian Barnes over for a toll violation, then jumped onto the doorsill of Barnes's moving car and shot him twice, killing him. The Fifth Circuit had a rule that said courts could only evaluate whether the force was reasonable at the precise moment the officer perceived a threat, which cut out everything the officer did to put himself in that position in the first place. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in May 2025 that the Fourth Amendment requires courts to look at the totality of the circumstances, including what happened before the trigger was pulled, and sent the case back.

The Conclusion

Conclusion

The Supreme Court held unanimously that Fourth Amendment excessive force claims require courts to examine the totality of circumstances, not just the moment of perceived threat. The Court rejected the Fifth Circuit's approach that excluded consideration of the officer's conduct leading up to the use of force.

The Record · 1 original document
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
FiledMay 24, 2024
CL StatusActive
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

Cert GrantedOct 4, 2024
StatusActive
Filed (CL)May 24, 2024
View on CourtListener →
SCOTUS TMR-04f4a513 Aug 8, 2026

Related by Concept (1)

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support