Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights v. DHS
Case Overview
Casa, Inc., Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, Make The Road New York and United Farm Workers of America appealed Judge McFadden's denial of a preliminary injunction.
The Application
The plaintiff organizations challenged the Noncitizen Registration Rule as violating their members' constitutional and statutory protections and sought to enjoin its enforcement. Judge McFadden found that plaintiffs failed to satisfy the preliminary injunction standard and denied their request for relief at the district court level.
The Conclusion
The case is active on appeal before the D.C. Circuit, which will review whether the district court correctly applied the preliminary injunction factors and whether plaintiffs demonstrated a likelihood of success on their underlying challenge to the rule's validity.
Case Analysis
Overview
Casa, Inc., Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, Make The Road New York and United Farm Workers of America appealed Judge McFadden's denial of a preliminary injunction.
Issue
Whether the Noncitizen Registration Rule violates the constitutional or statutory rights of immigrant advocacy organizations and their members, and whether plaintiffs satisfied the preliminary injunction standard requiring likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, favorable balance of equities, and public interest protection.
Rule
To obtain a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) likelihood of success on the merits; (2) likelihood of irreparable harm absent an injunction; (3) balance of equities tilts in plaintiff's favor; and (4) an injunction is in the public interest. An appellate court reviews the district court's legal conclusions de novo and factual findings for clear error.
Analysis
The plaintiff organizations challenged the Noncitizen Registration Rule as violating their members' constitutional and statutory protections and sought to enjoin its enforcement. Judge McFadden found that plaintiffs failed to satisfy the preliminary injunction standard and denied their request for relief at the district court level.
Conclusion
The case is active on appeal before the D.C. Circuit, which will review whether the district court correctly applied the preliminary injunction factors and whether plaintiffs demonstrated a likelihood of success on their underlying challenge to the rule's validity.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support