Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights v. Department of Homeland Security
Case Overview
The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, United Farm Workers of America, Casa, Inc., and Make the Road NY sued the Trump administration over a new immigrant registration rule which requires non citizens to register with the federal government and carry this registration at all times or face prosecution.
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
The Application
The challenged rule requires all noncitizens to register with the federal government and maintain registration documents at all times under penalty of prosecution. Plaintiffs contend this blanket requirement infringes liberty and movement rights without adequate due process and exceeds statutory bounds, while the government asserts immigration enforcement authority.
The Conclusion
The case is active in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia before Judge Trevor N. McFadden; resolution will depend on whether the court finds the registration requirement violates constitutional protections or statutory limits on executive authority.
Case Analysis
Overview
The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, United Farm Workers of America, Casa, Inc., and Make the Road NY sued the Trump administration over a new immigrant registration rule which requires non citizens to register with the federal government and carry this registration at all times or face prosecution.
Issue
Whether the noncitizen registration rule violates the Fifth Amendment due process rights and First Amendment freedoms of association and movement, and whether the rule exceeds the government's statutory authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act and Administrative Procedure Act.
Rule
Noncitizens retain constitutional protections including Fifth Amendment due process rights and First Amendment freedoms. Agency regulations must comply with the Administrative Procedure Act and cannot exceed delegated statutory authority. Registration and documentation requirements that burden fundamental rights or liberty interests are subject to constitutional scrutiny.
Analysis
The challenged rule requires all noncitizens to register with the federal government and maintain registration documents at all times under penalty of prosecution. Plaintiffs contend this blanket requirement infringes liberty and movement rights without adequate due process and exceeds statutory bounds, while the government asserts immigration enforcement authority.
Conclusion
The case is active in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia before Judge Trevor N. McFadden; resolution will depend on whether the court finds the registration requirement violates constitutional protections or statutory limits on executive authority.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support