Comans v. Department of Homeland Security
Case Overview
Mary Comans, a member of the Senior Executive Service at FEMA, sued the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA over her termination, alleging that her firing was done without cause or the due process required by law and violated the Privacy Act in her termination.
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
The Application
Comans challenges her termination as lacking statutory authority and procedural safeguards, and alleges that DHS violated the Privacy Act by improperly handling her personal information during the firing process. Resolution depends on whether she held a constitutionally protected interest in her SES position and whether the agency followed required procedures.
The Conclusion
The case remains active in United States District Court for the District of Columbia under Judge Ana C. Reyes with no final judgment rendered. The court will determine whether Comans's rights were violated and what remedies are appropriate.
Case Analysis
Overview
Mary Comans, a member of the Senior Executive Service at FEMA, sued the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA over her termination, alleging that her firing was done without cause or the due process required by law and violated the Privacy Act in her termination.
Issue
Did the Department of Homeland Security violate federal law by terminating Mary Comans, a Senior Executive Service member, without cause or constitutionally adequate due process, and did the agency violate the Privacy Act in connection with her termination?
Rule
Senior Executive Service members are generally at-will employees but retain constitutional due process protections if they possess a property interest in continued employment. The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a) prohibits federal agencies from maintaining, using, or disclosing personal records except in accordance with statutory restrictions.
Analysis
Comans challenges her termination as lacking statutory authority and procedural safeguards, and alleges that DHS violated the Privacy Act by improperly handling her personal information during the firing process. Resolution depends on whether she held a constitutionally protected interest in her SES position and whether the agency followed required procedures.
Conclusion
The case remains active in United States District Court for the District of Columbia under Judge Ana C. Reyes with no final judgment rendered. The court will determine whether Comans's rights were violated and what remedies are appropriate.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support