← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Massachusetts v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

No. 1:25-cv-13165 District · Active Active
Court
Federal Court
mad
Judge
Indira Talwani 44
Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Judge (CL)
Indira Talwani 44
Filed (CL)
Oct 28, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

A coalition of states sued the Trump administration over the suspension of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits for November 2025.

BrynoDC Coverage 2 videos

TikTok
News - SNAP Contingency Fund Clarification
Nov 9, 2025

The Application

History

States allege the USDA suspended SNAP benefits through executive action without notice-and-comment rulemaking or demonstrated statutory authorization, causing immediate harm to millions of beneficiaries and imposing compliance costs on state agencies.

The Conclusion

The case remains active in the District of Massachusetts with preliminary injunction briefing ongoing; the outcome will determine whether the benefits suspension can proceed pending resolution of the administrative law and statutory authority questions.


Case Analysis

Overview

A coalition of states sued the Trump administration over the suspension of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits for November 2025.

Issue

Whether the Trump administration had statutory authority under the Food and Nutrition Act to suspend Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits in November 2025, and whether the suspension violated the Administrative Procedure Act by bypassing required procedures.

Rule

Under the Administrative Procedure Act, agency actions must not be arbitrary and capricious; agencies must follow statutory procedures including notice-and-comment rulemaking for substantive policy changes. The Food and Nutrition Act grants USDA authority to administer SNAP but requires compliance with specified administrative procedures.

Analysis

States allege the USDA suspended SNAP benefits through executive action without notice-and-comment rulemaking or demonstrated statutory authorization, causing immediate harm to millions of beneficiaries and imposing compliance costs on state agencies.

Conclusion

The case remains active in the District of Massachusetts with preliminary injunction briefing ongoing; the outcome will determine whether the benefits suspension can proceed pending resolution of the administrative law and statutory authority questions.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support