← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Corner Post v. Federal Reserve Board

No. 22-1008 SCOTUS · Decided SCOTUS
Argued: Feb 20, 2024 Decided: Jul 1, 2024


The Law · How the Case Works

Overview

Overview

A North Dakota truck stop that opened in 2018 sued to challenge a Federal Reserve rule about debit card transaction fees that had been final law since 2011. The government argued the suit was time-barred. Federal law gives challengers six years from when a rule takes effect. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in July 2024 that the six-year clock starts when the rule injures a specific party, not when published. For a business that didn't exist until 2018, the window opened in 2018. The consequence is significant: there's now no effective statute of limitations on administrative rules.

The Conclusion

Conclusion

The Supreme Court held 6-3 that the statute of limitations for challenging administrative rules begins when the rule injures a specific party, not when the rule is published. This means businesses can challenge even decades-old rules if they did not exist when the rule took effect. The decision effectively eliminates any enforceable limitations period for administrative rule challenges.

The Record · 1 original document
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
FiledNov 14, 2022
CL Statusterminated
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

Cert Granted -
Statusterminated
Filed (CL)Nov 14, 2022
View on CourtListener →
SCOTUS TMR-ad9cd44f Jul 28, 2026

Related Cases (3)

  • Gitlow v. New York
    Gitlow v. New York is cited for the legal principle that constitutional protections apply to states through incorporation, establishing foundational precedent for how federal constitutional limits constrain government action.
  • Lochner v. New York
    Lochner v. New York is cited as historical precedent regarding judicial review of agency action and the scope of remedies available to plaintiffs challenging government regulations.
  • FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
    The active case cites FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine as relevant authority.
Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support