County of Santa Clara v. Noem
Overview
Overview
A coalition of cities sued the Trump administration over the conditions being put on emergency preparedness funding which requires cities to enforce federal civil immigration law.
The Issue
Issue
Whether the federal government may condition emergency preparedness funding on cities' enforcement of federal immigration law.
The Rules
Rule
The Spending Clause permits conditional federal grants, but conditions must be clearly stated and not so coercive as to be unconstitutionally compulsory; the federal government may not commandeer state and local officials to enforce federal law under the Tenth Amendment.
The Application
Analysis
The Trump administration imposed immigration enforcement requirements on emergency preparedness grant recipients, which plaintiffs contend violates spending clause limits by being coercive and unrelated to the grant's purpose, and violates anti-commandeering principles by conscripting local officials into federal enforcement.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
The case remains active before Judge Orrick in the Northern District of California; the court has not yet resolved the merits of plaintiffs' constitutional challenge.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support