Democratic National Committee v. Trump
Case Overview
The League of United Latin American Citizens sued the Trump administration over President Trump's elections executive order which purports to regulate federal elections by directing the Election Assistance Commission to require a citizenship document to register to vote. This case was consolidated with similar suits brought by the DNC and the League of Women Voters Education Fund.
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
The Application
Plaintiffs challenge whether the EO lawfully directs the EAC (an independent agency) to impose new voter registration requirements when citizenship is already federally mandated; whether the requirement was adopted through proper APA procedures; and whether it effectively commandeers state election officials in violation of federalism principles and voters' statutory rights.
The Conclusion
The case remains active in the D.C. District Court before Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, consolidated with parallel suits by the DNC and League of Women Voters Education Fund, with the court to adjudicate whether the EO exceeds executive authority and election law requirements.
Case Analysis
Overview
The League of United Latin American Citizens sued the Trump administration over President Trump's elections executive order which purports to regulate federal elections by directing the Election Assistance Commission to require a citizenship document to register to vote. This case was consolidated with similar suits brought by the DNC and the League of Women Voters Education Fund.
Issue
Whether President Trump's Elections Integrity Executive Order directing the Election Assistance Commission to require citizenship documentation for voter registration exceeds constitutional and statutory limits on executive power, violates the Voting Rights Act, and improperly infringes on state control of federal elections.
Rule
The President's executive authority is limited by the Take Care Clause and must comply with the Administrative Procedure Act; the Voting Rights Act prohibits election-related actions with disparate impact on protected classes; states retain primary authority over federal election administration under the Elections Clause; and executive orders directing agency rulemaking must follow proper notice-and-comment procedures.
Analysis
Plaintiffs challenge whether the EO lawfully directs the EAC, an independent agency, to impose new voter registration requirements when citizenship is already federally mandated; whether the requirement was adopted through proper APA procedures; and whether it effectively commandeers state election officials in violation of federalism principles and voters' statutory rights.
Conclusion
The case remains active in the D.C. District Court before Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, consolidated with parallel suits by the DNC and League of Women Voters Education Fund, with the court to adjudicate whether the EO exceeds executive authority and election law requirements.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support