Doe v. Department of Homeland Security
Case Overview
An immigrant residing in Texas is challenging the Department of Homeland Security's Interim Final Rule requiring noncitizens to submit fingerprints and other biometric information to the federal government and carry proof of this registration.
BrynoDC Coverage 2 videos
The Application
The plaintiff contends that mandatory biometric collection without particularized suspicion constitutes a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and that the registration requirement impermissibly burdens due process rights of noncitizens. The government asserts its broad authority to regulate immigration and collect biometric data for national security purposes.
The Conclusion
The litigation is active and pending decision; no final ruling on the constitutional or administrative law challenges has been issued to date.
Case Analysis
Overview
An immigrant residing in Texas is challenging the Department of Homeland Security's Interim Final Rule requiring noncitizens to submit fingerprints and other biometric information to the federal government and carry proof of this registration.
Issue
Whether the Department of Homeland Security's Interim Final Rule requiring noncitizens to submit biometric information and carry proof of registration violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures or the Fifth Amendment's due process guarantee.
Rule
Agency immigration regulations are reviewed under the Administrative Procedure Act standard of arbitrariness and capriciousness; constitutional challenges to searches and seizures require evaluation under Fourth Amendment reasonableness analysis, which typically requires individualized suspicion or a valid warrant absent an established exception.
Analysis
The plaintiff contends that mandatory biometric collection without particularized suspicion constitutes a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and that the registration requirement impermissibly burdens due process rights of noncitizens. The government asserts its broad authority to regulate immigration and collect biometric data for national security purposes.
Conclusion
The litigation is active and pending decision; no final ruling on the constitutional or administrative law challenges has been issued to date.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support