Franco Aleman v. President Trump
Case Overview
A coalition of state attorneys general sued President Trump over the constitutionality of the order. The suit alleges the EO violates the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. This case was consolidated with a similar suit from the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, on behalf of 3 expecting mothers.
BrynoDC Coverage 2 videos
The Application
The executive order seeks to redefine 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' to exclude certain categories of children, directly contradicting both the amendment's plain language and established Supreme Court precedent interpreting jurisdiction broadly.
The Conclusion
The court decided the constitutional challenge to the birthright citizenship executive order, addressing whether the executive may restrict the citizenship rights conferred by the 14th Amendment.
No circuit court data for this case.
No Supreme Court data for this case.
Case Analysis
Issue
Whether an executive order purporting to eliminate automatic birthright citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrants violates the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause.
Rule
The 14th Amendment provides that all persons born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are citizens. Under United States v. Wong Kim Ark, this includes children born within U.S. territory regardless of parental immigration status, with narrow exceptions only for children of foreign diplomats.
Analysis
The executive order seeks to redefine 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' to exclude certain categories of children, directly contradicting both the amendment's plain language and established Supreme Court precedent interpreting jurisdiction broadly.
Conclusion
The court decided the constitutional challenge to the birthright citizenship executive order, addressing whether the executive may restrict the citizenship rights conferred by the 14th Amendment.
Notes
CourtListener 404. Docket may have been removed or ID is incorrect
Overview
A coalition of state attorneys general sued President Trump over the constitutionality of the order. The suit alleges the EO violates the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. This case was consolidated with a similar suit from the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, on behalf of 3 expecting mothers.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support