Gadot America, Inc. v. United States Customs and Border Protection
Case Overview
Gadot America, Inc. sued the Trump administration over President Trump's Liberation Day tariffs and subsequent modifications made to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
The Application
Gadot America challenges the tariff impositions and Harmonized Tariff Schedule modifications as unauthorized exercises of executive power, requiring the Court of International Trade to examine whether the emergency was properly declared and whether the tariff measures bear a rational relationship to addressing it.
The Conclusion
The case remains active before the Court of International Trade (judges Gary S. Katzmann, Timothy M. Reif, and Jane A. Restani); no ruling on the merits has been issued as of the case filing date of November 11, 2025.
Case Analysis
Overview
Gadot America, Inc. sued the Trump administration over President Trump's Liberation Day tariffs and subsequent modifications made to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
Issue
Whether the President lawfully exercised authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) in imposing tariffs designated as "Liberation Day" tariffs and making modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
Rule
The IEEPA authorizes the President to regulate foreign commerce during declared national emergencies, but only to the extent necessary to address the emergency; courts review whether the emergency declaration is supported and whether regulatory measures are rationally related to addressing the claimed emergency.
Analysis
Gadot America challenges the tariff impositions and Harmonized Tariff Schedule modifications as unauthorized exercises of executive power, requiring the Court of International Trade to examine whether the emergency was properly declared and whether the tariff measures bear a rational relationship to addressing it.
Conclusion
The case remains active before the Court of International Trade (judges Gary S. Katzmann, Timothy M. Reif, and Jane A. Restani); no ruling on the merits has been issued as of the case filing date of November 11, 2025.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support