Gitlow v. New York (Free Speech, NY)
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
The Facts
Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist, was arrested and convicted under New York's Criminal Anarchy Statute for publishing a manifesto advocating forcible overthrow of the government. Gitlow challenged his conviction as violating free speech rights. New York courts upheld the conviction, and Gitlow appealed to the Supreme Court.
The Issue
• Whether the First Amendment protection of free speech applies to state governments through the Fourteenth Amendment • Whether New York's Criminal Anarchy Statute unconstitutionally prohibited speech advocating overthrow of the government
The Rules
Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.
No State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
Freedom of speech and press are fundamental personal rights and liberties protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment from impairment by the states.
The Application
The Court first applied incorporation doctrine to New York's Criminal Anarchy Act, holding that this state statute must satisfy First Amendment standards, a groundbreaking expansion of constitutional protection. However, under the lenient "bad tendency" test, the Court found Gitlow's published manifesto fell within punishable speech: its advocacy of violent overthrow of government had a tendency to incite lawless action, which the state could constitutionally prevent. The Court deferred to New York's legislative judgment that this particular publication (promoting "revolutionary mass action") posed a sufficient threat to justify criminal penalties. Gitlow thus illustrates how incorporation expanded speech protection in principle while the "bad tendency" standard permitted substantial practical restrictions on radical political expression.
The Conclusion
**The Court held 7-2 that the First Amendment applies to states via the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, establishing incorporation doctrine.** However, the Court upheld Gitlow's conviction under the "bad tendency" test, reasoning the state could punish speech tending to incite unlawful action. This case marked a pivotal shift in constitutional protection of free expression, even though Gitlow lost his case.
No circuit court data for this case.
Case Analysis
Overview
The Court held that the First Amendment's free speech protection applies to states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
Overview
The Court held that the First Amendment's free speech protection applies to states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
Facts
Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist, was arrested and convicted under New York's Criminal Anarchy Statute for publishing a manifesto advocating forcible overthrow of the government. Gitlow challenged his conviction as violating free speech rights. New York courts upheld the conviction, and Gitlow appealed to the Supreme Court.
Facts
Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist, was arrested and convicted under New York's Criminal Anarchy Statute for publishing a manifesto advocating forcible overthrow of the government. Gitlow challenged his conviction as violating free speech rights. New York courts upheld the conviction, and Gitlow appealed to the Supreme Court.
Issue
Whether New York's Criminal Anarchy Act violated the First Amendment's protection of speech and press by criminalizing publication of a left-wing manifesto advocating the overthrow of the government, and whether the First Amendment applies to restrict state action through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Rule
Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925), assumed, for the first time, that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause incorporates First Amendment freedoms of speech and press against the states, beginning the doctrine of selective incorporation. Despite incorporation, the Court upheld the conviction under the 'bad tendency' test, deferring to the legislature's judgment that the speech tended to subvert the government.
Issue
Whether New York's Criminal Anarchy Act violated the First Amendment's protection of speech and press by criminalizing publication of a left-wing manifesto advocating the overthrow of the government, and whether the First Amendment applies to restrict state action through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Analysis
The Court first applied incorporation doctrine to New York's Criminal Anarchy Act, holding that this state statute must satisfy First Amendment standards. A groundbreaking expansion of constitutional protection. However, under the lenient "bad tendency" test, the Court found Gitlow's published manifesto fell within punishable speech: its advocacy of violent overthrow of government had a tendency to incite lawless action, which the state could constitutionally prevent. The Court deferred to New York's legislative judgment that this particular publication. Promoting "revolutionary mass action",posed a sufficient threat to justify criminal penalties. Gitlow thus illustrates how incorporation expanded speech protection in principle while the "bad tendency" standard permitted substantial practical restrictions on radical political expression.
Rule
Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925), assumed, for the first time, that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause incorporates First Amendment freedoms of speech and press against the states, beginning the doctrine of selective incorporation. Despite incorporation, the Court upheld the conviction under the 'bad tendency' test, deferring to the legislature's judgment that the speech tended to subvert the government.
Conclusion
The Court held 7-2 that the First Amendment applies to states via the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, establishing incorporation doctrine. However, the Court upheld Gitlow's conviction under the "bad tendency" test, reasoning the state could punish speech tending to incite unlawful action. This case marked a pivotal shift in constitutional protection of free expression, even though Gitlow lost his case.
Conclusion
**The Court held 7-2 that the First Amendment applies to states via the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, establishing incorporation doctrine.** However, the Court upheld Gitlow's conviction under the "bad tendency" test, reasoning the state could punish speech tending to incite unlawful action. This case marked a pivotal shift in constitutional protection of free expression, even though Gitlow lost his case.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support