← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Greater Boston Latino Network v. Noem

No. 1:26-cv-10472 District · Active Active
Court
Federal Court
mad
Judge
Julia E. Kobick 46
Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Judge (CL)
Julia E. Kobick 46
Filed (CL)
Jan 30, 2026
CL Status
active

Case Overview

2 non-profit organizations sued the Department of Homeland Security over the memorandum from acting ICE Director Todd Lyons that authorizes ICE agents to enter homes to conduct immigration enforcement with an administrative warrant, not a judicial warrant.


The Application

History

Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons' memorandum authorizes ICE agents to enter homes with administrative warrants rather than judicial warrants for immigration enforcement. Plaintiffs argue this violates Fourth Amendment protections for the home and exceeds the scope of permissible administrative warrants.

The Conclusion

The case is currently active in the District of Massachusetts, with no final ruling yet on whether the administrative warrant authorization is constitutional.

Federal Court TMR-6c2ae04b ICE Administrative Warrant Jul 11, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

2 non-profit organizations sued the Department of Homeland Security over the memorandum from acting ICE Director Todd Lyons that authorizes ICE agents to enter homes to conduct immigration enforcement with an administrative warrant, not a judicial warrant.

Issue

Whether ICE's use of administrative warrants to enter private homes for immigration enforcement violates the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement.

Rule

The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and generally requires judicial warrants based on probable cause for home entries. Administrative warrants may be used in certain regulatory contexts, but the home receives heightened constitutional protection.

Analysis

Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons' memorandum authorizes ICE agents to enter homes with administrative warrants rather than judicial warrants for immigration enforcement. Plaintiffs argue this violates Fourth Amendment protections for the home and exceeds the scope of permissible administrative warrants.

Conclusion

The case is currently active in the District of Massachusetts, with no final ruling yet on whether the administrative warrant authorization is constitutional.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support