← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Gribbon v. Office of Personnel Management

No. 1:26-cv-01575 District · Active Active
Court
D.D.C.
dcd
Judge
Tanya S. Chutkan 44
Filed
May 8, 2026
Judge (CL)
Tanya S. Chutkan 44
Filed (CL)
May 8, 2026
CL Status
active

Case Overview

Individuals who shared personal sensitive information with the U.S. government sued the Trump administration over DOGE's ability to gain access to information at the Social Security Administration.


The Application

History

Plaintiffs challenge DOGE's attempt to obtain access to sensitive personal data held at SSA, raising questions about whether DOGE possesses statutory authority to demand such information and whether the Trump administration followed required legal procedures to authorize cross-agency data access.

The Conclusion

The case remains active in the District of Columbia federal court before Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, with the court poised to determine whether DOGE's data access violates privacy law and exceeds administrative authority.

Federal Court TMR-9138c731 DOGE at Social Security Administration Jul 11, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

Individuals who shared personal sensitive information with the U.S. government sued the Trump administration over DOGE's ability to gain access to information at the Social Security Administration.

Issue

Whether the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has lawful authority to access sensitive personal information maintained by the Social Security Administration without statutory authorization or adequate privacy safeguards.

Rule

Executive agencies may access personal information only to the extent authorized by statute or regulation, and such access is constrained by the Privacy Act, which restricts government collection and use of personal data, and by administrative law principles requiring agencies to act within the scope of their delegated authority.

Analysis

Plaintiffs challenge DOGE's attempt to obtain access to sensitive personal data held at SSA, raising questions about whether DOGE possesses statutory authority to demand such information and whether the Trump administration followed required legal procedures to authorize cross-agency data access.

Conclusion

The case remains active in the District of Columbia federal court before Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, with the court poised to determine whether DOGE's data access violates privacy law and exceeds administrative authority.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support