Iverson v. Trump
Case Overview
Eric Iverson, a prosecutor in the International Criminal Court, sued the Trump administration over President Trump's executive order which authorizes sanctions against the ICC.
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
The Application
Iverson, an ICC prosecutor, challenged Trump's executive order authorizing ICC sanctions, arguing the President exceeded statutory authority or violated law and international obligations owed to the ICC.
The Conclusion
The case was decided by Judge Christopher R. Cooper, resolving the scope of presidential power to impose sanctions against the ICC without congressional prior approval.
Case Analysis
Issue
Whether the President may authorize sanctions against the International Criminal Court through executive order.
Rule
Presidential authority to impose sanctions derives from statutes delegating executive power to the executive branch, and must operate within the bounds of that delegation and constitutional limitations on separation of powers.
Analysis
Iverson, an ICC prosecutor, challenged Trump's executive order authorizing ICC sanctions, arguing the President exceeded statutory authority or violated law and international obligations owed to the ICC.
Conclusion
The case was decided by Judge Christopher R. Cooper, resolving the scope of presidential power to impose sanctions against the ICC without congressional prior approval.
Overview
Eric Iverson, a prosecutor in the International Criminal Court, sued the Trump administration over President Trump's executive order which authorizes sanctions against the ICC.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support