← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez

No. 19-896 SCOTUS · Decided SCOTUS
Argued: Jan 11, 2022 Decided: Jun 13, 2022


The Law · How the Case Works

Overview

Overview

The Supreme Court held that noncitizens detained under 8 U.S.C. 1231(a)(6) after a final order of removal are not entitled to automatic bond hearings after six months of detention. The ruling rejected a judicially created bright-line rule as inconsistent with the statutory text.

The Facts

Facts

Alejandro Arteaga-Martinez, a Mexican national ordered removed, was detained under Section 1231(a)(6) when his removal could not be executed. After six months, the Ninth Circuit held he was entitled to a bond hearing under the statute's interpretation in Zadvydas v. Davis.

The Issue

Issue

Whether Section 1231(a)(6) entitles detained noncitizens to automatic bond hearings after six months of post-removal-order detention.

The Rules

Rule

Statutes authorizing detention do not implicitly require bond hearings at fixed intervals absent clear statutory text. Courts may not impose procedural requirements on detention that the statute itself does not mandate.

The Application

Analysis

When Arteaga-Martinez challenged his detention under Section 1231(a)(6) after six months, the Court analyzed whether the statute's text supported the Ninth Circuit's bright-line rule entitling him to an automatic hearing. Finding no statutory language that establishes a temporal trigger for bond hearings, the Court held that the judiciary cannot impose procedural safeguards that Congress did not write into the statute. Although noncitizens retain habeas corpus remedies to challenge detention on individualized grounds, the statute does not categorically require periodic hearings based solely on the passage of time. This interpretation restored the detention scheme to its statutory text rather than allowing judge-made categorical rules to override legislative silence.

The Conclusion

Conclusion

The Court reversed, holding that Section 1231(a)(6) does not require bond hearings after six months. Noncitizens may seek relief through habeas corpus on individualized grounds, but no categorical rule entitles them to periodic hearings.

The Record · 1 original document
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Filed -
CL StatusActive
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

Cert Granted -
StatusActive
Filed (CL) -
View on CourtListener →
SCOTUS TMR-a0090fd3 Jul 28, 2026
Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support