← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

McAuliffe v. City of New Bedford (New Bedford, SCOTUS, 1892)

No. 1:02-cv-09530 District · Decided Teaching/Historical
Court
State Court
Judge
Shira A. Scheindlin
Decided
Mar 13, 2013
Filed
Nov 27, 2002

BrynoDC Coverage 2 videos


The Issue

• Does a municipal regulation restricting a police officer's political activities as a condition of employment violate his constitutional rights? • Does a public employee retain constitutional protections against conditions imposed on the privilege of public employment?

The Rules

McAuliffe v. City of New Bedford, 155 Mass. 216 (1892) Right-Privilege Distinction in Public Employment

A person has no constitutional right to public employment; the government may condition employment on the waiver of rights that could not be directly abridged, because holding office is a privilege and not a right.

U.S. Const. amend. I First Amendment - Freedom of Speech and Political Association

Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble - raised by McAuliffe as protecting his political solicitation activities.

U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1 Fourteenth Amendment - Due Process and Equal Protection

No State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law - at issue as to whether dismissal from public employment implicated a protected liberty or property interest.

State Court TMR-a3f79453 Jul 19, 2026
Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support