← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild v. Department of Homeland Security

No. 1:25-cv-01115 District · Active Active
Court
D.D.C.
dcd
Judge
Sparkle L. Sooknanan 46
Filed
Apr 14, 2025
Judge (CL)
Sparkle L. Sooknanan 46
Filed (CL)
Apr 14, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild sued the Department of Homeland Security to ensure compliance with its FOIA request for information related to a memorandum on matters impacting unaccompanied immigrant children.


The Application

History

The National Immigration Project seeks DHS records concerning a memorandum on unaccompanied immigrants via FOIA. DHS must either produce the documents or provide a legally sufficient explanation for withholding under claimed exemptions such as attorney-client privilege, law enforcement concerns, or deliberative process privilege.

The Conclusion

The case remains active as the court evaluates DHS's compliance with the FOIA request and the adequacy of any claimed exemptions.

Federal Court TMR-480a458d DHS FOIA Suit Jul 11, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild sued the Department of Homeland Security to ensure compliance with its FOIA request for information related to a memorandum on matters impacting unaccompanied immigrant children.

Issue

Whether the Department of Homeland Security must comply with a FOIA request for information regarding a memorandum on matters affecting unaccompanied immigrant children.

Rule

The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, requires federal agencies to disclose requested records unless they fall within one of nine statutory exemptions. Agencies bear the burden of justifying any withholding through detailed Vaughn index declarations.

Analysis

The National Immigration Project seeks DHS records concerning a memorandum on unaccompanied immigrants via FOIA. DHS must either produce the documents or provide a legally sufficient explanation for withholding under claimed exemptions such as attorney-client privilege, law enforcement concerns, or deliberative process privilege.

Conclusion

The case remains active as the court evaluates DHS's compliance with the FOIA request and the adequacy of any claimed exemptions.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support