← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Novedades Y Servicios, Inc., et al. v. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, et al.

No. 25-4238 Circuit · Active Active
Court
9th Cir.
ca9
Argued
Feb 2, 2026
Filed
Jul 9, 2025
Filed (CL)
Jul 9, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

The government appealed Judge Sammartino's order granting a preliminary injunction of the new Geographic Targeting Order from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network which requires businesses along the southern border to file Currency Transaction Reports with FinCEN at a $200 threshold.


The Application

History

The district court found that appellees demonstrated likelihood of success on their APA challenge and that the balance of equities favored an injunction, thus granting preliminary relief that the government now appeals.

The Conclusion

The 9th Circuit is reviewing whether the preliminary injunction was properly issued and whether the GTO is lawful under the APA.

Federal Court TMR-063fd13a FinCEN Southern Border Policy <br> Appeal of 3:25-cv-00886 Jul 14, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

The government appealed Judge Sammartino's order granting a preliminary injunction of the new Geographic Targeting Order from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network which requires businesses along the southern border to file Currency Transaction Reports with FinCEN at a $200 threshold.

Issue

Whether FinCEN's Geographic Targeting Order requiring Currency Transaction Reports at a $200 threshold for southern border businesses violates the Administrative Procedure Act or exceeds FinCEN's statutory authority.

Rule

A preliminary injunction requires likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, favorable balance of equities, and service of the public interest; agency action is arbitrary and capricious if it relies on factors Congress did not intend or fails to consider an important aspect of the problem.

Analysis

The district court found that appellees demonstrated likelihood of success on their APA challenge and that the balance of equities favored an injunction, thus granting preliminary relief that the government now appeals.

Conclusion

The 9th Circuit is reviewing whether the preliminary injunction was properly issued and whether the GTO is lawful under the APA.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support