Pacito et al v. Trump, et al. (Refugee freeze, 9th Cir. 25-1313)
Overview
Overview
The government appealed Judge Whitehead's preliminary injunction requiring the Trump administration to restore refugee processing.
The Issue
Issue
Whether the Trump administration's refugee resettlement pause violates constitutional or statutory protections, and whether the district court properly issued a preliminary injunction requiring restoration of refugee processing.
The Rules
Rule
A preliminary injunction is appropriate when the moving party demonstrates: (1) likelihood of success on the merits, (2) irreparable harm absent injunctive relief, (3) the balance of equities favors the injunction, and (4) the injunction serves the public interest. An appellate court reviews the district court's preliminary injunction order for abuse of discretion.
The Application
Analysis
Judge Whitehead found that plaintiffs demonstrated sufficient likelihood of success on what appear to be constitutional claims, that refugees face irreparable harm from processing delays, and that the balance of equities and public interest favor resuming refugee admissions. The Ninth Circuit must determine whether this determination was an abuse of discretion.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
The preliminary injunction remains in effect pending appellate resolution; the Ninth Circuit has not yet decided the merits of the government's appeal.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support