← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Pedro Vasquez Perdomo v. Noem

No. 2:25-cv-05605 District · Active Active

Case Overview

5 individuals stopped or arrested during immigration raids, represented by the ACLU, sued the Department of Homeland Security over the alleged use of race or ethnicity by U.S. Border Patrol agents to conduct immigration enforcement.

BrynoDC Coverage 1 video

TikTok
090925 - 9/9 go see the files for yourself. #epsteinfiles #civics #newstoj #fyp
Sep 9, 2025

The Application

History

Plaintiffs allege Border Patrol targeted them for immigration stops and arrests based solely or primarily on their race or ethnicity without individualized suspicion, using pretextual enforcement to accomplish discriminatory ends.

The Conclusion

The case is active; plaintiffs seek declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and damages from DHS for violations of their constitutional rights during the immigration raids.

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
FiledJun 20, 2025
Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong 46
CL Statusactive
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

No Supreme Court data for this case.

Federal Court TMR-cc11be69 Immigration Enforcement Jul 15, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

5 individuals stopped or arrested during immigration raids, represented by the ACLU, sued the Department of Homeland Security over the alleged use of race or ethnicity by U.S. Border Patrol agents to conduct immigration enforcement.

Issue

Whether U.S. Border Patrol agents violated the Fourth Amendment and Equal Protection Clause by using race or ethnicity as a factor in selecting plaintiffs for stops and arrests during immigration enforcement operations.

Rule

The Equal Protection Clause prohibits intentional race-based discrimination and requires strict scrutiny review; the Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, and stops motivated by race are unconstitutional regardless of ultimate arrest legality.

Analysis

Plaintiffs allege Border Patrol targeted them for immigration stops and arrests based solely or primarily on their race or ethnicity without individualized suspicion, using pretextual enforcement to accomplish discriminatory ends.

Conclusion

The case is active; plaintiffs seek declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and damages from DHS for violations of their constitutional rights during the immigration raids.

Notes

C.D. Cal. Renamed from transcript artifact "Noem v. Perdomo".

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support