RFE/RL, Inc. v. Kari Lake
Case Overview
The government appealed Judge Lamberth's temporary restraining order which requires the disbursement of congressional appropriated funds to cover RFE/RL's April expenditures.
BrynoDC Coverage 2 videos
The Application
The district court found the TRO warranted based on RFE/RL's likelihood of success on its appropriations claim and irreparable harm from nonpayment of lawful obligations, requiring disbursement of April expenditures despite the freeze.
The Conclusion
The CADC reviewed whether the TRO was proper, resolving the conflict between the executive's asserted authority to freeze funds and Congress's power of the purse over RFE/RL's statutory appropriations.
Case Analysis
Issue
Whether the district court properly issued a temporary restraining order requiring the government to disburse congressionally appropriated funds to RFE/RL despite an executive fund freeze.
Rule
Courts apply the traditional preliminary injunction standard. Likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, balance of equities, and public interest. And must account for separation of powers concerns when executive action conflicts with congressional appropriations authority.
Analysis
The district court found the TRO warranted based on RFE/RL's likelihood of success on its appropriations claim and irreparable harm from nonpayment of lawful obligations, requiring disbursement of April expenditures despite the freeze.
Conclusion
The CADC reviewed whether the TRO was proper, resolving the conflict between the executive's asserted authority to freeze funds and Congress's power of the purse over RFE/RL's statutory appropriations.
Overview
The government appealed Judge Lamberth's temporary restraining order which requires the disbursement of congressional appropriated funds to cover RFE/RL's April expenditures.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support