← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Rhode Island AFL-CIO v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

No. 1:25-cv-00510 District · Active Active
Court
Federal Court
rid
Judge
Mary S. McElroy 45
Filed
Oct 6, 2025
Judge (CL)
Mary S. McElroy 45
Filed (CL)
Oct 6, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

Business owners and non-profit organizations sued the EPA over the termination of the Solar for All grants, despite Congress only rescinding unobligated balances in July 2025.


The Application

History

Congress restricted only unobligated balances in July 2025, implying obligated funds remained available for Solar for All. If the EPA terminated grants despite available obligated balances or lacked independent statutory authority to cancel the program entirely, the agency's action exceeded the scope of Congressional rescission.

The Conclusion

The case is active in Rhode Island District Court with Judge Mary S. McElroy. Resolution depends on whether the court finds the EPA acted within appropriations law or overstepped by terminating obligated grants.

Federal Court TMR-ece4ddd2 Federal Grant Cancellation Jul 11, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

Business owners and non-profit organizations sued the EPA over the termination of the Solar for All grants, despite Congress only rescinding unobligated balances in July 2025.

Issue

Whether the EPA exceeded its statutory authority by terminating the Solar for All grant program when Congress rescinded only unobligated balances, leaving obligated funds available.

Rule

An executive agency cannot expend or obligate funds beyond the scope authorized by Congress through appropriations legislation. Under the Antideficiency Act and Administrative Procedure Act, agency actions must comply with Congressional restrictions on fund availability and statutory limits on agency discretion.

Analysis

Congress restricted only unobligated balances in July 2025, implying obligated funds remained available for Solar for All. If the EPA terminated grants despite available obligated balances or lacked independent statutory authority to cancel the program entirely, the agency's action exceeded the scope of Congressional rescission.

Conclusion

The case is active in Rhode Island District Court with Judge Mary S. McElroy. Resolution depends on whether the court finds the EPA acted within appropriations law or overstepped by terminating obligated grants.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support