← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Rhode Island State Council of Churches v. Rollins (RI SNAP Suspension 2025)

No. 1:25-cv-00569 District · Decided Decided
Court
Federal Court
rid
Judge
John J. McConnell Jr. 44
Decided
Mar 3, 2026
Filed
Oct 30, 2025
Judge (CL)
John J. McConnell Jr. 44
Filed (CL)
Oct 30, 2025
CL Status
terminated

Case Overview

A coalition of nonprofits and cities sued the Trump administration over the suspension of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits for November 2025.

BrynoDC Coverage 1 video

TikTok
News - SNAP Contingency Fund Clarification
Nov 9, 2025

The Application

History

The plaintiff-coalition alleged that the administration lacked statutory authority to suspend benefits nationally and failed to follow required procedural safeguards. The court evaluated whether the Food and Nutrition Act authorized such a suspension, whether proper notice and hearing procedures were observed, and whether the agency's action was supported by adequate justification.

The Conclusion

The district court decided the case, addressing whether the November 2025 SNAP suspension was authorized by statute and complied with procedural requirements under the Food and Nutrition Act and Administrative Procedure Act.

Outcome History (4)

  1. Nov 1, 2025 District
    TRO granted Full relief

    Emergency motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary stay granted.

  2. Nov 6, 2025 District
    TRO granted Full relief

    Motion to enforce TRO and motion for TRO granted.

  3. Dec 5, 2025 Circuit
    Dismissed Relief denied Final

    Appeal dismissed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

  4. Mar 3, 2026 District
    Voluntarily dismissed Settled Final

    Case dismissed with prejudice per stipulation of dismissal filed by all plaintiffs.

Federal Court TMR-e9cf52f3 SNAP Benefits Suspension May 18, 2026

Case Analysis

Issue

Whether the Trump administration's suspension of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for November 2025 was authorized by the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 and complied with procedural requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Rule

Under 7 U.S.C. § 2011 et seq., the Secretary of Agriculture administers SNAP subject to statutory authorization. The Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706, requires that agency action be authorized by law, not arbitrary or capricious, and in accordance with statutory procedures; agency decisions affecting individual rights require procedural due process including adequate notice and opportunity to be heard.

Analysis

The plaintiff-coalition alleged that the administration lacked statutory authority to suspend benefits nationally and failed to follow required procedural safeguards. The court evaluated whether the Food and Nutrition Act authorized such a suspension, whether proper notice and hearing procedures were observed, and whether the agency's action was supported by adequate justification.

Conclusion

The district court decided the case, addressing whether the November 2025 SNAP suspension was authorized by statute and complied with procedural requirements under the Food and Nutrition Act and Administrative Procedure Act.

Overview

A coalition of nonprofits and cities sued the Trump administration over the suspension of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits for November 2025.

Overview

The government appealed Judge McConnell's temporary restraining order which required the full payment of SNAP benefits by the USDA for November.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support