← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights v. Department of State

No. 1:25-cv-01774 District · Active Active
Court
D.D.C.
dcd
Judge
James E. Boasberg 44
Filed
Jun 5, 2025
Judge (CL)
James E. Boasberg 44
Filed (CL)
Jun 5, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

RFK Human Rights and 4 other nonprofit organizations sued the Department of State over the agreement or series of agreements signed with El Salvador pursuant to which the U.S. government has sent individuals to be incarcerated in detention facilities.


The Application

History

Plaintiffs challenge the U.S./El Salvador agreement as violating due process and APA requirements by transferring individuals to foreign detention facilities without adequate procedural protections, notice, or express congressional authorization for such transfers.

The Conclusion

The case remains active in the D.C. District Court under Judge Boasberg's consideration of the constitutional and administrative law challenges to the detention transfer agreement.

Federal Court TMR-fe0ed0e8 U.S./El Salvador Agreement May 18, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

RFK Human Rights and 4 other nonprofit organizations sued the Department of State over the agreement or series of agreements signed with El Salvador pursuant to which the U.S. government has sent individuals to be incarcerated in detention facilities.

Issue

Whether the Department of State violated constitutional and administrative law requirements by entering into an agreement with El Salvador for transferring individuals to foreign detention facilities without adequate statutory authority or procedural safeguards.

Rule

The Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause protects individuals from deprivation of liberty without proper procedures; the Administrative Procedure Act constrains agency action affecting individual rights; international agreements involving transfer of persons require statutory authorization.

Analysis

Plaintiffs challenge the U.S./El Salvador agreement as violating due process and APA requirements by transferring individuals to foreign detention facilities without adequate procedural protections, notice, or express congressional authorization for such transfers.

Conclusion

The case remains active in the D.C. District Court under Judge Boasberg's consideration of the constitutional and administrative law challenges to the detention transfer agreement.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support