Civil Servant 1 v. U.S. Office of Special Counsel
Overview
Overview
5 civil servants, represented by Democracy Forward, sued the Office of Special Counsel over its "Probationary Directive" which closed investigations into the widespread termination of probationary employees.
The Issue
Issue
Whether the Office of Special Counsel exceeded its statutory authority by issuing a 'Probationary Directive' that categorically closed investigations into terminations of federal probationary employees without individualized review of alleged prohibited personnel practices.
The Rules
Rule
5 U.S.C. § 2302 prohibits personnel actions motivated by protected activity such as whistleblowing. The OSC is statutorily mandated to investigate allegations of prohibited personnel practices. Agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act may not be arbitrary or capricious.
The Application
Analysis
Democracy Forward contends that OSC's blanket closure of probationary-employee termination investigations violates the statutory mandate to investigate alleged prohibited personnel practices and impermissibly creates a categorical exemption based on employment classification rather than case-by-case analysis of potential wrongdoing.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
The action remains pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia with no ruling on the merits; resolution turns on whether OSC's directive falls within its delegated investigative authority or represents an unauthorized reinterpretation of its statutory obligations.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support