← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Salazar v. Paramount Global

SCOTUS · Active Active SCOTUS
Cert Granted: Jan 26, 2026

Case Overview

A case in which the Court will decide whether the phrase "goods or services from a video tape service provider," as used in the Video Privacy Protection Act's definition of "consumer," refers to all of a video tape service provider's goods or services or only to its audiovisual goods or services.


The Application

History

Paramount Global, as a video tape service provider offering both audiovisual streaming services and non-audiovisual goods, must be evaluated under this statutory scope question to determine whether VPPA protections extend to all customer transactions or only to video-related offerings.

The Conclusion

The court will resolve whether VPPA's "consumer" definition extends to all goods and services offered by a video tape service provider or only to its audiovisual content and services.

CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Filed -
CL Status -

No circuit court data for this case.

Cert GrantedJan 26, 2026
Status -
Filed (CL) -
SCOTUS TMR-7376d392 Jun 17, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

A case in which the Court will decide whether the phrase "goods or services from a video tape service provider," as used in the Video Privacy Protection Act's definition of "consumer," refers to all of a video tape service provider's goods or services or only to its audiovisual goods or services.

Issue

Whether the phrase "goods or services from a video tape service provider" in the Video Privacy Protection Act's definition of "consumer" encompasses all of a video tape service provider's goods or services, or only its audiovisual goods or services.

Rule

The Video Privacy Protection Act (18 U.S.C. § 2710) defines "consumer" with reference to "goods or services from a video tape service provider," which determines the scope of statutory protections for customer records and viewing history disclosures.

Analysis

Paramount Global, as a video tape service provider offering both audiovisual streaming services and non-audiovisual goods, must be evaluated under this statutory scope question to determine whether VPPA protections extend to all customer transactions or only to video-related offerings.

Conclusion

The court will resolve whether VPPA's "consumer" definition extends to all goods and services offered by a video tape service provider or only to its audiovisual content and services.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support