← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Governor Shapiro v. U.S. Department of the Interior

No. 2:25-cv-00763 District · Decided Decided
Court
Federal Court
paed
Judge
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG 43
Decided
Aug 13, 2025
Filed
Feb 13, 2025
Judge (CL)
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG 43
Filed (CL)
Feb 13, 2025
CL Status
terminated

Case Overview

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro sued the Trump administration over the freeze of federal funding and grants. Plaintiffs are requesting the court enjoin defendants' from freezing, pausing, or conditioning the disbursement of congressionally awarded funds.


The Application

History

Governor Shapiro argued the Trump administration's freeze violates the Appropriations Clause because the funds have already been congressionally designated. The administration must justify the freeze as within executive authority, while the court assesses whether the state established likelihood of success on its constitutional impoundment claim and qualifies for preliminary injunctive relief to resume fund disbursement.

The Conclusion

The court issued a decision on the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction addressing the legality of the federal funding freeze and the executive's authority to pause disbursement of congressionally appropriated funds.

Outcome History (1)

  1. Aug 13, 2025 District
    Voluntarily dismissed Settled Final

    Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs

Federal Court TMR-2a981520 <a href="https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/trump-orders-pause-on-federal-financial-assistance"> Federal Funding Freeze </a> May 18, 2026

Case Analysis

Issue

Whether the executive branch may unilaterally freeze or condition the disbursement of federal funds and grants that Congress has already appropriated through legislation.

Rule

The Appropriations Clause vests Congress with the power of the purse, and the President generally lacks authority to impound or refuse to spend appropriated funds absent explicit statutory authorization. A preliminary injunction requires showing likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, balance of equities, and that relief serves the public interest.

Analysis

Governor Shapiro argued the Trump administration's freeze violates the Appropriations Clause because the funds have already been congressionally designated. The administration must justify the freeze as within executive authority, while the court assesses whether the state established likelihood of success on its constitutional impoundment claim and qualifies for preliminary injunctive relief to resume fund disbursement.

Conclusion

The court issued a decision on the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction addressing the legality of the federal funding freeze and the executive's authority to pause disbursement of congressionally appropriated funds.

Overview

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro sued the Trump administration over the freeze of federal funding and grants. Plaintiffs are requesting the court enjoin defendants' from freezing, pausing, or conditioning the disbursement of congressionally awarded funds.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support