New Jersey v. President Trump (EO freeze, D. Mass., 2025)
Case Overview
A coalition of state and city attorneys general sued President Trump over the constitutionality of the order. The suit alleges the EO violates the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
BrynoDC Coverage 2 videos
The Application
The state and city attorneys general allege the executive order violates the Citizenship Clause by limiting automatic citizenship to children of non-citizen parents. Resolution requires determining whether the executive order conflicts with the plain language of the 14th Amendment and whether any constitutional authority permits such limitations.
The Conclusion
The case is active before Judge Leo T. Sorokin in the District of Massachusetts, with the constitutionality of the birthright citizenship order currently under review.
No circuit court data for this case.
No Supreme Court data for this case.
Case Analysis
Overview
A coalition of state and city attorneys general sued President Trump over the constitutionality of the order. The suit alleges the EO violates the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Overview
The government appealed the district court's order granting the plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction. This case was consolidated with a similar suit brought by O. Doe
Overview
The government appealed Judge Sorokin's order on the scope of the preliminary injunction, which upholds his original preliminary injunction preventing the enforcement of President Trump's birthright citizenship executive order.
Issue
Whether President Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship violates the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Rule
The 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause automatically grants citizenship to all persons born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction. Courts apply strict scrutiny to constitutional challenges claiming an executive action conflicts with explicit constitutional text.
Analysis
The state and city attorneys general allege the executive order violates the Citizenship Clause by limiting automatic citizenship to children of non-citizen parents. Resolution requires determining whether the executive order conflicts with the plain language of the 14th Amendment and whether any constitutional authority permits such limitations.
Conclusion
The case is active before Judge Leo T. Sorokin in the District of Massachusetts, with the constitutionality of the birthright citizenship order currently under review.
Notes
CourtListener 404. Docket may have been removed or ID is incorrect
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support