← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Rhode Island v. Department of Interior

No. 1:25-cv-00439 District · Decided Decided
Court
Federal Court
rid
Judge
Mary S. McElroy 45
Decided
Dec 11, 2025
Filed
Sep 4, 2025
Judge (CL)
Mary S. McElroy 45
Filed (CL)
Sep 4, 2025
CL Status
terminated

Case Overview

Rhode Island and Connecticut sued the Department of the Interior of the halting of the Revolution Wind project, a wind energy facility previously permitted by the federal government.


The Application

History

The DOI's decision to halt a previously-federally-permitted wind energy project triggered APA review to determine whether the agency adequately explained its reversal of the prior approval and whether it followed proper procedural requirements in doing so.

The Conclusion

The case was decided by the court on the merits, with the determination of whether the DOI's halting action was lawful or violated the Administrative Procedure Act reflected in the judgment.

Outcome History (2)

  1. Oct 1, 2025 District
    Stay denied Relief denied

    Defendants' Motion to Hold Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Abeyance is denied.

  2. Dec 11, 2025 District
    Transferred Neutral Final

    Case transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Federal Court TMR-3f3b3028 Halting of Revolution Wind Project May 18, 2026

Case Analysis

Issue

Whether the Department of Interior acted within its statutory authority and in compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act when it halted the Revolution Wind Project after the federal government had previously permitted the energy facility.

Rule

Under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 706), agency action must not be arbitrary and capricious or otherwise contrary to law. An agency that reverses a prior permit decision must provide a rational explanation for the change in position and comply with required administrative procedures.

Analysis

The DOI's decision to halt a previously-federally-permitted wind energy project triggered APA review to determine whether the agency adequately explained its reversal of the prior approval and whether it followed proper procedural requirements in doing so.

Conclusion

The case was decided by the court on the merits, with the determination of whether the DOI's halting action was lawful or violated the Administrative Procedure Act reflected in the judgment.

Overview

Rhode Island and Connecticut sued the Department of the Interior of the halting of the Revolution Wind project, a wind energy facility previously permitted by the federal government.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support