Rhode Island v. Department of Interior
Case Overview
Rhode Island and Connecticut sued the Department of the Interior of the halting of the Revolution Wind project, a wind energy facility previously permitted by the federal government.
The Application
The DOI's decision to halt a previously-federally-permitted wind energy project triggered APA review to determine whether the agency adequately explained its reversal of the prior approval and whether it followed proper procedural requirements in doing so.
The Conclusion
The case was decided by the court on the merits, with the determination of whether the DOI's halting action was lawful or violated the Administrative Procedure Act reflected in the judgment.
Case Analysis
Issue
Whether the Department of Interior acted within its statutory authority and in compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act when it halted the Revolution Wind Project after the federal government had previously permitted the energy facility.
Rule
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 706), agency action must not be arbitrary and capricious or otherwise contrary to law. An agency that reverses a prior permit decision must provide a rational explanation for the change in position and comply with required administrative procedures.
Analysis
The DOI's decision to halt a previously-federally-permitted wind energy project triggered APA review to determine whether the agency adequately explained its reversal of the prior approval and whether it followed proper procedural requirements in doing so.
Conclusion
The case was decided by the court on the merits, with the determination of whether the DOI's halting action was lawful or violated the Administrative Procedure Act reflected in the judgment.
Overview
Rhode Island and Connecticut sued the Department of the Interior of the halting of the Revolution Wind project, a wind energy facility previously permitted by the federal government.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support