Taal v. Trump
Case Overview
2 students and a professor at Cornell University sued the Trump administration over the "Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and National Security and Public Safety Threats" and "Additional Measures to Combat Anti Semitism" executive orders that plaintiffs allege interfere with their free speech rights.
The Application
Plaintiffs contend the executive orders impermissibly restrict their speech and expressive activities as members of the Cornell University community.
The Conclusion
The case was decided by Judge Elizabeth C. Coombe in the Northern District of New York.
Case Analysis
Issue
Whether executive orders addressing foreign terrorism and anti-semitism restrict the First Amendment free speech rights of university students and faculty.
Rule
Content-based restrictions on speech are subject to strict scrutiny and must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest.
Analysis
Plaintiffs contend the executive orders impermissibly restrict their speech and expressive activities as members of the Cornell University community.
Conclusion
The case was decided by Judge Elizabeth C. Coombe in the Northern District of New York.
Overview
2 students and a professor at Cornell University sued the Trump administration over the "Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and National Security and Public Safety Threats" and "Additional Measures to Combat Anti Semitism" executive orders that plaintiffs allege interfere with their free speech rights.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support