United States v. Letitia James
Legal Issues
BrynoDC Coverage 2 videos
Overview
Overview
The government appealed Senior United States District Judge McGowan Currie's orders granting Comey and James' motions to dismiss which also found that Lindsey Halligan's appointment to serve as U.S. attorney was unlawful. The appeals were consolidated on Jan. 12, 2026.
The Issue
Issue
Whether the district court properly dismissed charges against Comey and James based on finding the U.S. attorney's appointment violated the Appointments Clause.
The Rules
Rule
Officers of the United States must be appointed pursuant to constitutional procedures under the Appointments Clause; an unlawful appointment may render official actions void or subject to challenge.
The Application
Analysis
The district judge determined that U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan's appointment was unconstitutional and granted Comey and James' motions to dismiss in both underlying criminal cases (1:25-cr-00272 and 2:25-cr-00122) on that basis.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
The government appealed the dismissal orders, which were consolidated in the Fourth Circuit on January 12, 2026, and remain pending.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support