← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Webber et. al v. Department of Homeland Security

No. 25-2717 Circuit · Active Active
Court
9th Cir.
ca9
Argued
Sep 17, 2025
Filed
Apr 28, 2025
Filed (CL)
Apr 28, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

Plaintiffs in Webber v. DHS appealed Judge Christensen's decision transferring the case to the U.S. Court of International Trade.


The Application

History

Judge Christensen transferred the Webber case to CIT, apparently finding the claims fell within CIT's exclusive tariff jurisdiction. The appellants contend the transfer was improper because the case raises constitutional challenges to IEEPA's exercise or involves remedies outside CIT's scope.

The Conclusion

The Ninth Circuit is reviewing the transfer order on appeal. The case remains active pending determination of whether the challenged tariffs present claims properly within CIT's exclusive jurisdiction or whether constitutional and equitable issues warrant retention in district court.

Federal Court TMR-732c4a8f IEEPA Tariffs <br> Appeal of 4:25-cv-00026 Jul 15, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

Plaintiffs in Webber v. DHS appealed Judge Christensen's decision transferring the case to the U.S. Court of International Trade.

Issue

Whether a federal district court properly transferred a case challenging IEEPA tariffs to the U.S. Court of International Trade, or whether the case involves constitutional or equitable claims requiring district court jurisdiction.

Rule

The Court of International Trade has exclusive jurisdiction over civil actions arising from tariffs and trade duties under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a), but district courts may retain jurisdiction when cases present constitutional claims or require equitable remedies beyond CIT's specialized purview.

Analysis

Judge Christensen transferred the Webber case to CIT, apparently finding the claims fell within CIT's exclusive tariff jurisdiction. The appellants contend the transfer was improper because the case raises constitutional challenges to IEEPA's exercise or involves remedies outside CIT's scope.

Conclusion

The Ninth Circuit is reviewing the transfer order on appeal. The case remains active pending determination of whether the challenged tariffs present claims properly within CIT's exclusive jurisdiction or whether constitutional and equitable issues warrant retention in district court.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support