← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Widakuswara v. Lake (Dismantle USAGM, 2025 Ma)

No. 1:25-cv-01015 District · Active Active
Court
D.D.C.
dcd
Judge
Royce C. Lamberth 40
Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Judge (CL)
Royce C. Lamberth 40
Filed (CL)
Apr 4, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

Voice of America employees, contractors, and labor organizations representing VOA employees sued the U.S. Agency for Global Media over the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle USAGM and shutdown VOA.


The Application

History

VOA employees and contractors sued after the administration initiated dismantling efforts for USAGM/VOA, asserting the Executive lacked statutory authority, failed to follow APA procedures, and violated employment protections. The court must examine Congressional statutes governing USAGM/VOA's creation and scope of executive authority.

The Conclusion

The case remains active in D.C. District Court before Judge Royce C. Lamberth; no ruling on merits has been issued, leaving the validity of the dismantling efforts subject to ongoing litigation.

Federal Court TMR-439a6c9b VOA Dismantling Jul 14, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

Voice of America employees, contractors, and labor organizations representing VOA employees sued the U.S. Agency for Global Media over the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle USAGM and shutdown VOA.

Issue

Whether the Executive branch has statutory and constitutional authority to dismantle the Voice of America and U.S. Agency for Global Media without Congressional approval.

Rule

Federal agencies are creatures of statute and may only exercise powers delegated by Congress; the Administrative Procedure Act requires procedural compliance for significant agency actions; federal employees retain statutory employment protections and may assert constitutional claims.

Analysis

VOA employees and contractors sued after the administration initiated dismantling efforts for USAGM/VOA, asserting the Executive lacked statutory authority, failed to follow APA procedures, and violated employment protections. The court must examine Congressional statutes governing USAGM/VOA's creation and scope of executive authority.

Conclusion

The case remains active in D.C. District Court before Judge Royce C. Lamberth; no ruling on merits has been issued, leaving the validity of the dismantling efforts subject to ongoing litigation.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support