← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Zak Designs, Inc. v. United States Customs and Border Protection

No. 1:25-cv-00266 District · Active Active
Court
Federal Court
cit
Judge
Gary S. Katzmann Timothy M. Reif Jane A. Restani
Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Judge (CL)
Gary S. Katzmann Timothy M. Reif Jane A. Restani
Filed (CL)
Nov 14, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

Zak Designs, Inc sued the Trump administration over President Trump's Liberation Day tariffs and subsequent modifications made to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.


The Application

History

The Trump administration imposed the "Liberation Day" tariffs pursuant to IEEPA and modified the tariff schedule; Zak Designs challenges both the validity of the underlying emergency declaration and whether the tariff modifications followed required procedures.

The Conclusion

The case is active before the Court of International Trade, which has jurisdiction to review whether IEEPA properly supported the executive tariff action and whether statutory procedural requirements were satisfied.

Federal Court TMR-f0c7334e IEEPA Tariffs May 18, 2026

Case Analysis

Overview

Zak Designs, Inc sued the Trump administration over President Trump's Liberation Day tariffs and subsequent modifications made to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

Issue

Whether the President's invocation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) authorizes the imposition of the "Liberation Day" tariffs and modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.

Rule

Under IEEPA, the President may regulate commerce during a declared national emergency, but such action must have a sufficient factual basis and comply with statutory procedures governing tariff schedule modifications under 19 U.S.C. § 1502 and related provisions.

Analysis

The Trump administration imposed the "Liberation Day" tariffs pursuant to IEEPA and modified the tariff schedule; Zak Designs challenges both the validity of the underlying emergency declaration and whether the tariff modifications followed required procedures.

Conclusion

The case is active before the Court of International Trade, which has jurisdiction to review whether IEEPA properly supported the executive tariff action and whether statutory procedural requirements were satisfied.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support